How Does Texas House Bill 19 (CPRC Chapter 72) Two-Phase Trial Bifurcation Work in 18-Wheeler Lawsuits?
Direct Answer Under Texas Law
Enacted in 2021 via House Bill 19, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 72.052 allows any commercial motor vehicle defendant to move (within 120 days of its original answer) for a bifurcated two-phase trial before the same jury. If the trucking company stipulates under § 72.054 that the driver was acting within the course and scope of employment, Phase I is limited strictly to whether the driver was negligent and the amount of compensatory damages—holding back negligent hiring, training, supervision, and punitive damages for Phase II!
Critical Texas Procedural Trap to Watch Out For
Even in Phase I of a Chapter 72 bifurcated trial, CPRC § 72.053(b) preserves two key exceptions: (1) independent statutory violations of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) or state law listed in § 72.053(b)(1) that proximately caused the wreck, and (2) negligent maintenance/inspection of the commercial vehicle itself (§ 72.053(b)(2))!
Recommended Action Plan for Texas Claimants
Plead specific FMCSR equipment and inspection violations under CPRC § 72.053(b) so negligent maintenance and statutory noncompliance enter evidence right in Phase I.
Detailed Texas Statutory & Case Law Breakdown
Under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 72.051–72.055 and controlling Texas appellate precedent in In re Central Oregon Truck Co., 644 S.W.3d 668 (Tex. 2022), Texas trial and appellate courts apply strict statutory rules to this exact issue. Unlike generic multi-state legal summaries, Texas tort procedure under the Civil Practice and Remedies Code (CPRC), Insurance Code, Transportation Code, and Labor Code enforces specific statutory formulas—including the 51% proportionate responsibility bar (CPRC § 33.001), paid-or-incurred medical expense admissibility (CPRC § 41.0105 / Haygood), and mandatory statutory lien caps (Prop. Code Ch. 55 & Ins. Code Ch. 140).
Step-by-Step Texas Procedural Checklist
- Verify the exact statutory text of Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 72.051–72.055 and how Texas courts apply In re Central Oregon Truck Co., 644 S.W.3d 668 (Tex. 2022) in your county's appellate district.
- Beware of the Texas Procedural Trap: Even in Phase I of a Chapter 72 bifurcated trial, CPRC § 72.053(b) preserves two key exceptions: (1) independent statutory violations of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) or state law listed in § 72.053(b)(1) that proximately caused the wreck, and (2) negligent maintenance/inspection of the commercial vehicle itself (§ 72.053(b)(2))!
- Execute the Texas Action Plan: Plead specific FMCSR equipment and inspection violations under CPRC § 72.053(b) so negligent maintenance and statutory noncompliance enter evidence right in Phase I.
- Preserve all physical, electronic, and medical billing records early so your CPRC § 18.001 affidavits and TRCP 194.2 Initial Disclosures are complete.
Frequently Asked Questions Under Texas Law
How Does Texas House Bill 19 (CPRC Chapter 72) Two-Phase Trial Bifurcation Work in 18-Wheeler Lawsuits?
Enacted in 2021 via House Bill 19, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 72.052 allows any commercial motor vehicle defendant to move (within 120 days of its original answer) for a bifurcated two-phase trial before the same jury. If the trucking company stipulates under § 72.054 that the driver was acting within the course and scope of employment, Phase I is limited strictly to whether the driver was negligent and the amount of compensatory damages—holding back negligent hiring, training, supervision, and punitive damages for Phase II! Key Texas Trap to Avoid: Even in Phase I of a Chapter 72 bifurcated trial, CPRC § 72.053(b) preserves two key exceptions: (1) independent statutory violations of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) or state law listed in § 72.053(b)(1) that proximately caused the wreck, and (2) negligent maintenance/inspection of the commercial vehicle itself (§ 72.053(b)(2))!
What Texas statute and Supreme Court / appellate precedent control texas hb 19 (cprc ch. 72) truck trial bifurcation?
This question is governed in Texas by Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 72.051–72.055 and the legal standards articulated in In re Central Oregon Truck Co., 644 S.W.3d 668 (Tex. 2022). Recommended step: Plead specific FMCSR equipment and inspection violations under CPRC § 72.053(b) so negligent maintenance and statutory noncompliance enter evidence right in Phase I.
Mandatory 6-Point Texas Legal Disclaimer & Notice
- 1. Not Legal Advice: This website provides general educational and statutory reference information strictly scoped to Texas personal injury law, Texas courts, and Texas statutes. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice, a legal opinion, or counseling on any specific set of facts.
- 2. No Attorney-Client Relationship: Viewing this website, reading any statutory or procedural guide, or using any interactive calculator, checklist, or reference tool does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and this publisher or any contributor.
- 3. Content May Be Inaccurate or Outdated: Although articles reference the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code (CPRC), Texas Transportation Code, Texas Insurance Code, Texas Labor Code, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (TRCP), and published decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas and the 15 Texas Courts of Appeals, legislation and appellate holdings change continually. Information on this website may be incomplete, inaccurate, or superseded by subsequent statutory amendments or judicial opinions.
- 4. Verify With a Licensed Texas Attorney: Deadlines under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003, municipal charter notice windows under § 101.101, and comparative fault bars under Chapter 33 are strictly enforced. Always verify your legal rights, filing deadlines, and jurisdictional rules directly with an attorney licensed and in good standing with the State Bar of Texas.
- 5. No Guarantee of Results: Statutory damage cap formulas, proportionate responsibility illustrations, and medical bill adjustment examples are mathematical and educational illustrations only. They do not predict, warrant, or guarantee any specific verdict, settlement amount, or legal outcome in any Texas court.
- 6. Independent Reference Portal — Not a Law Firm: Texas Injury Law Reference is an independent legal education publication. We are not a law firm, do not practice law, do not solicit clients, and do not operate as an attorney referral service.