TEXAS INJURY LAW REFERENCE
TEXAS LEGAL DISCLAIMER: (1) Educational Texas statutory reference only — NOT legal advice; (2) Using this site or its calculators creates NO attorney-client relationship; (3) Content may be incomplete or change by statute/case law; (4) Always verify deadlines and rights with a licensed Texas attorney; (5) Statutory formulas and examples create NO guarantee of results; (6) Not a law firm or lawyer referral service. Full 6-Point Legal Disclaimer ↓
Jurisdiction: State of Texas OnlyReviewed by: Texas Legal Reference Editorial BoardUpdated: 2026-10-28Authority: Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33; Farley v. M M Cattle Co. Abolition

Does 'Assumption of the Risk' Still Exist as a Complete Defense in Texas Personal Injury Law?

Governing Texas StatuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33; Farley v. M M Cattle Co. Abolition
Controlling Texas CaseFarley v. M M Cattle Co., 529 S.W.2d 751 (Tex. 1975); Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith, 307 S.W.3d 762 (Tex. 2010)
Topic CategoryComparative Fault & Liability Rules

Direct Answer Under Texas Law

No, implied assumption of the risk was abolished as a standalone complete bar in Texas ordinary negligence cases in Farley v. M M Cattle Co., 529 S.W.2d 751 (Tex. 1975) and merged into Texas's Chapter 33 proportionate responsibility framework! Today, only (1) Express Assumption of the Risk (a valid written pre-injury waiver complying with the Express Negligence Doctrine), or (2) the Sports Participant 'Inherent Risk' Doctrine (Phi Delta Theta v. Leto / Dunagan) operates as a separate bar.

Critical Texas Procedural Trap to Watch Out For

Note also that in Texas Non-Subscriber workplace injury cases, Tex. Lab. Code § 406.033(a)(2) expressly strips the employer of ANY assumption-of-the-risk defense, and § 406.033(e) voids pre-injury liability waivers!

Recommended Action Plan for Texas Claimants

If an adjuster tells you that you 'assumed the risk' of an accident, remind them that Farley v. M M Cattle Co. abolished implied assumption of the risk in Texas half a century ago.

Detailed Texas Statutory & Case Law Breakdown

Under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33; Farley v. M M Cattle Co. Abolition and controlling Texas appellate precedent in Farley v. M M Cattle Co., 529 S.W.2d 751 (Tex. 1975); Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith, 307 S.W.3d 762 (Tex. 2010), Texas trial and appellate courts apply strict statutory rules to this exact issue. Unlike generic multi-state legal summaries, Texas tort procedure under the Civil Practice and Remedies Code (CPRC), Insurance Code, Transportation Code, and Labor Code enforces specific statutory formulas—including the 51% proportionate responsibility bar (CPRC § 33.001), paid-or-incurred medical expense admissibility (CPRC § 41.0105 / Haygood), and mandatory statutory lien caps (Prop. Code Ch. 55 & Ins. Code Ch. 140).

Step-by-Step Texas Procedural Checklist

  • Verify the exact statutory text of Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33; Farley v. M M Cattle Co. Abolition and how Texas courts apply Farley v. M M Cattle Co., 529 S.W.2d 751 (Tex. 1975); Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith, 307 S.W.3d 762 (Tex. 2010) in your county's appellate district.
  • Beware of the Texas Procedural Trap: Note also that in Texas Non-Subscriber workplace injury cases, Tex. Lab. Code § 406.033(a)(2) expressly strips the employer of ANY assumption-of-the-risk defense, and § 406.033(e) voids pre-injury liability waivers!
  • Execute the Texas Action Plan: If an adjuster tells you that you 'assumed the risk' of an accident, remind them that Farley v. M M Cattle Co. abolished implied assumption of the risk in Texas half a century ago.
  • Preserve all physical, electronic, and medical billing records early so your CPRC § 18.001 affidavits and TRCP 194.2 Initial Disclosures are complete.

Frequently Asked Questions Under Texas Law

Does 'Assumption of the Risk' Still Exist as a Complete Defense in Texas Personal Injury Law?

No, implied assumption of the risk was abolished as a standalone complete bar in Texas ordinary negligence cases in Farley v. M M Cattle Co., 529 S.W.2d 751 (Tex. 1975) and merged into Texas's Chapter 33 proportionate responsibility framework! Today, only (1) Express Assumption of the Risk (a valid written pre-injury waiver complying with the Express Negligence Doctrine), or (2) the Sports Participant 'Inherent Risk' Doctrine (Phi Delta Theta v. Leto / Dunagan) operates as a separate bar. Key Texas Trap to Avoid: Note also that in Texas Non-Subscriber workplace injury cases, Tex. Lab. Code § 406.033(a)(2) expressly strips the employer of ANY assumption-of-the-risk defense, and § 406.033(e) voids pre-injury liability waivers!

What Texas statute and Supreme Court / appellate precedent control does 'assumption of the risk' exist in texas??

This question is governed in Texas by Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33; Farley v. M M Cattle Co. Abolition and the legal standards articulated in Farley v. M M Cattle Co., 529 S.W.2d 751 (Tex. 1975); Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith, 307 S.W.3d 762 (Tex. 2010). Recommended step: If an adjuster tells you that you 'assumed the risk' of an accident, remind them that Farley v. M M Cattle Co. abolished implied assumption of the risk in Texas half a century ago.

Mandatory 6-Point Texas Legal Disclaimer & Notice

  • 1. Not Legal Advice: This website provides general educational and statutory reference information strictly scoped to Texas personal injury law, Texas courts, and Texas statutes. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice, a legal opinion, or counseling on any specific set of facts.
  • 2. No Attorney-Client Relationship: Viewing this website, reading any statutory or procedural guide, or using any interactive calculator, checklist, or reference tool does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and this publisher or any contributor.
  • 3. Content May Be Inaccurate or Outdated: Although articles reference the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code (CPRC), Texas Transportation Code, Texas Insurance Code, Texas Labor Code, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (TRCP), and published decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas and the 15 Texas Courts of Appeals, legislation and appellate holdings change continually. Information on this website may be incomplete, inaccurate, or superseded by subsequent statutory amendments or judicial opinions.
  • 4. Verify With a Licensed Texas Attorney: Deadlines under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003, municipal charter notice windows under § 101.101, and comparative fault bars under Chapter 33 are strictly enforced. Always verify your legal rights, filing deadlines, and jurisdictional rules directly with an attorney licensed and in good standing with the State Bar of Texas.
  • 5. No Guarantee of Results: Statutory damage cap formulas, proportionate responsibility illustrations, and medical bill adjustment examples are mathematical and educational illustrations only. They do not predict, warrant, or guarantee any specific verdict, settlement amount, or legal outcome in any Texas court.
  • 6. Independent Reference Portal — Not a Law Firm: Texas Injury Law Reference is an independent legal education publication. We are not a law firm, do not practice law, do not solicit clients, and do not operate as an attorney referral service.