TEXAS INJURY LAW REFERENCE
TEXAS LEGAL DISCLAIMER: (1) Educational Texas statutory reference only — NOT legal advice; (2) Using this site or its calculators creates NO attorney-client relationship; (3) Content may be incomplete or change by statute/case law; (4) Always verify deadlines and rights with a licensed Texas attorney; (5) Statutory formulas and examples create NO guarantee of results; (6) Not a law firm or lawyer referral service. Full 6-Point Legal Disclaimer ↓
Jurisdiction: State of Texas OnlyReviewed by: Texas Legal Reference Editorial BoardUpdated: 2026-10-28Authority: Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33; Texas Non-Imputation Rule

Can a Parent's Negligence Be Imputed to Reduce an Injured Child's Own Recovery in Texas?

Governing Texas StatuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33; Texas Non-Imputation Rule
Controlling Texas CaseLowery v. Berry, 269 S.W.2d 795 (Tex. 1954); Shoemake v. Fogel, Ltd., 826 S.W.2d 933 (Tex. 1992)
Topic CategoryComparative Fault & Liability Rules

Direct Answer Under Texas Law

No! Under long-established Texas Supreme Court law (Lowery v. Berry, 269 S.W.2d 795 (Tex. 1954)), a parent's negligence (for example, a parent driving a car in which their child is injured, or a parent failing to watch a toddler near a hazard) is NEVER imputed to the child to bar or reduce the child's own recovery for pain, mental anguish, disfigurement, and permanent impairment—and under Shoemake v. Fogel, Ltd., 826 S.W.2d 933 (Tex. 1992), parental immunity bars a defendant from seeking contribution from the parent for the child's supervision!

Critical Texas Procedural Trap to Watch Out For

Wait—while parental fault does not reduce the child's own non-economic and post-18 damages, parental fault DOES reduce the parents' separate claim to recover pre-18 medical expenses.

Recommended Action Plan for Texas Claimants

Invoke Shoemake v. Fogel to block defense motions attempting to join or designate a parent as a Responsible Third Party for negligent parental supervision.

Detailed Texas Statutory & Case Law Breakdown

Under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33; Texas Non-Imputation Rule and controlling Texas appellate precedent in Lowery v. Berry, 269 S.W.2d 795 (Tex. 1954); Shoemake v. Fogel, Ltd., 826 S.W.2d 933 (Tex. 1992), Texas trial and appellate courts apply strict statutory rules to this exact issue. Unlike generic multi-state legal summaries, Texas tort procedure under the Civil Practice and Remedies Code (CPRC), Insurance Code, Transportation Code, and Labor Code enforces specific statutory formulas—including the 51% proportionate responsibility bar (CPRC § 33.001), paid-or-incurred medical expense admissibility (CPRC § 41.0105 / Haygood), and mandatory statutory lien caps (Prop. Code Ch. 55 & Ins. Code Ch. 140).

Step-by-Step Texas Procedural Checklist

  • Verify the exact statutory text of Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33; Texas Non-Imputation Rule and how Texas courts apply Lowery v. Berry, 269 S.W.2d 795 (Tex. 1954); Shoemake v. Fogel, Ltd., 826 S.W.2d 933 (Tex. 1992) in your county's appellate district.
  • Beware of the Texas Procedural Trap: Wait—while parental fault does not reduce the child's own non-economic and post-18 damages, parental fault DOES reduce the parents' separate claim to recover pre-18 medical expenses.
  • Execute the Texas Action Plan: Invoke Shoemake v. Fogel to block defense motions attempting to join or designate a parent as a Responsible Third Party for negligent parental supervision.
  • Preserve all physical, electronic, and medical billing records early so your CPRC § 18.001 affidavits and TRCP 194.2 Initial Disclosures are complete.

Frequently Asked Questions Under Texas Law

Can a Parent's Negligence Be Imputed to Reduce an Injured Child's Own Recovery in Texas?

No! Under long-established Texas Supreme Court law (Lowery v. Berry, 269 S.W.2d 795 (Tex. 1954)), a parent's negligence (for example, a parent driving a car in which their child is injured, or a parent failing to watch a toddler near a hazard) is NEVER imputed to the child to bar or reduce the child's own recovery for pain, mental anguish, disfigurement, and permanent impairment—and under Shoemake v. Fogel, Ltd., 826 S.W.2d 933 (Tex. 1992), parental immunity bars a defendant from seeking contribution from the parent for the child's supervision! Key Texas Trap to Avoid: Wait—while parental fault does not reduce the child's own non-economic and post-18 damages, parental fault DOES reduce the parents' separate claim to recover pre-18 medical expenses.

What Texas statute and Supreme Court / appellate precedent control can parental fault reduce a child's recovery??

This question is governed in Texas by Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33; Texas Non-Imputation Rule and the legal standards articulated in Lowery v. Berry, 269 S.W.2d 795 (Tex. 1954); Shoemake v. Fogel, Ltd., 826 S.W.2d 933 (Tex. 1992). Recommended step: Invoke Shoemake v. Fogel to block defense motions attempting to join or designate a parent as a Responsible Third Party for negligent parental supervision.

Mandatory 6-Point Texas Legal Disclaimer & Notice

  • 1. Not Legal Advice: This website provides general educational and statutory reference information strictly scoped to Texas personal injury law, Texas courts, and Texas statutes. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice, a legal opinion, or counseling on any specific set of facts.
  • 2. No Attorney-Client Relationship: Viewing this website, reading any statutory or procedural guide, or using any interactive calculator, checklist, or reference tool does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and this publisher or any contributor.
  • 3. Content May Be Inaccurate or Outdated: Although articles reference the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code (CPRC), Texas Transportation Code, Texas Insurance Code, Texas Labor Code, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (TRCP), and published decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas and the 15 Texas Courts of Appeals, legislation and appellate holdings change continually. Information on this website may be incomplete, inaccurate, or superseded by subsequent statutory amendments or judicial opinions.
  • 4. Verify With a Licensed Texas Attorney: Deadlines under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003, municipal charter notice windows under § 101.101, and comparative fault bars under Chapter 33 are strictly enforced. Always verify your legal rights, filing deadlines, and jurisdictional rules directly with an attorney licensed and in good standing with the State Bar of Texas.
  • 5. No Guarantee of Results: Statutory damage cap formulas, proportionate responsibility illustrations, and medical bill adjustment examples are mathematical and educational illustrations only. They do not predict, warrant, or guarantee any specific verdict, settlement amount, or legal outcome in any Texas court.
  • 6. Independent Reference Portal — Not a Law Firm: Texas Injury Law Reference is an independent legal education publication. We are not a law firm, do not practice law, do not solicit clients, and do not operate as an attorney referral service.